About Luther, Collier, Hodges & Cash, LLP

ALABAMA – Final Judgments – When 54b is Appropriate

In the case of Cox v. Parrish, Cox appeals his dismissed counterclaim against his sisters as co-executors in the administration of their deceased father’s estate. The lower court found his counterclaim time barred, and certified its dismissal under ARCP 54b. The Supreme Court of Alabama ruled that the lower court had exceeded its discretion by […]

Comments Off on ALABAMA – Final Judgments – When 54b is Appropriate Continue Reading →

FLORIDA – Construction – Statute of Repose

In Manney v. MBC Engineering, Inc., the Florida 5th DCA ruled that the statute of repose under section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2017) does not apply to certain inspection services. Manney hired MBV to conduct a pre-purchase inspection of a new residential home in 2002. MBV’s report indicated that the home was in excellent shape.  In […]

Comments Off on FLORIDA – Construction – Statute of Repose Continue Reading →

FLORIDA – Insurance – Appraisals Pursuant to Claims

In State Farm Florida Insurance v. Sheppard the Florida First DCA ruled that when a carrier agrees that part of a loss is covered by the applicable policy, the appraisal provision can be invoked. Sheppard filed an insurance claim with her carrier, State Farm, for water damage in her home caused by leaking pipes. Sheppard […]

Comments Off on FLORIDA – Insurance – Appraisals Pursuant to Claims Continue Reading →

ALABAMA – Jury Verdict – HIPAA

Congratulations to LCHC’s Regina Cash on obtaining $300,000 verdict against hospital in HIPAA lawsuit. READ MORE   

Comments Off on ALABAMA – Jury Verdict – HIPAA Continue Reading →

MISSISSIPPI – Expert Witnesses – Required or Not?

Mississippi  Court  of  Appeals:  an  expert  witness  is  not  required  to  prove  negligence where laymen can observe and understand the negligence as a matter of common sense and practical experience.  If it seems our cases are being overrun by expert witnesses, here the appeals court slowed the conquest in a case involving an automobile mechanic […]

Comments Off on MISSISSIPPI – Expert Witnesses – Required or Not? Continue Reading →

MISSISSIPPI – Civil Procedure – Extension to serve process beyond 120 days

Mississippi Court of  Appeals:  six efforts to serve process at the registered agent’s address within 120 days, plus a motion for extension on the 121st day, plus two more attempts (one being successful) shortly thereafter amounted to “good cause” and “diligence”; thus avoiding the harsh penalty of the statute of limitations. Joshua Adams v. MBA […]

Comments Off on MISSISSIPPI – Civil Procedure – Extension to serve process beyond 120 days Continue Reading →

ALABAMA – ERISA – Amendment of Pleadings

The Supreme Court of Alabama decided this week to reaffirm its liberal policy of allowing amendments to pleadings in the context of a wrongful death action surrounded by questions of ERISA preemption. The case involved a wrongful death claim against an insurance company administrating a deceased employee’s health benefit plan which he had received through […]

Comments Off on ALABAMA – ERISA – Amendment of Pleadings Continue Reading →

ALABAMA – Contracts – Arbitrator’s Authority

After a payment dispute in a construction case, the concrete subcontractor filed a lawsuit in circuit court against the general contractor and the owner/developer.  The Defendants filed a motion to stay and compel arbitration pursuant to the arbitration provisions in both the prime contract and the subcontract. The circuit court stayed the circuit court proceedings […]

Comments Off on ALABAMA – Contracts – Arbitrator’s Authority Continue Reading →

FLORIDA – Evidence – Expert Testimony

In 2017, The Florida Bar’s Code and Rules of Evidence Committee voted in favor of making the switch from Frye to Daubert, but the state’s high court had declined to make the switch at the time due to constitutional concerns. The Court’s concern over constitutional issues gave way upon review of the overwhelming use of […]

Comments Off on FLORIDA – Evidence – Expert Testimony Continue Reading →

FLORIDA – Public Utilities – Contesting Rate Increases

The Supreme Court of Florida has affirmed the Florida Public Service Commission’s decision to provide reimbursement to a public electrical utility company, FPL, through raising base rates for four of its solar energy centers. Nine entities had intervened in FPL’s petition to the Commission for the increase in rates. Several of those joined in a […]

Comments Off on FLORIDA – Public Utilities – Contesting Rate Increases Continue Reading →